Review methodology
How reviews are scored — Nigeria
The ranking is derived from the typed fact base and fixed code-defined weights.
Fixed dimensions
The five weights were fixed on 2026-07-10 and total 100 percent. Availability is market-specific; the remaining dimensions are jurisdiction-neutral.
Evidence limits
The method uses only published, not-published and not-verifiable evidence states. It does not claim first-hand deposit or withdrawal testing.
Published processing commitments are scored; measured payout speed and support quality are not scored because they were not measured.
How a licence is verified
An operator's licence claim is quoted from its own terms or licence page. Separately, where a regulator publishes a public register or a licence validator, that lookup is opened on the read date and recorded as its own cell: listed, not found, or unreachable from our review location. A licence is never described as verified on the strength of the operator's own claim alone.
Provable fairness is recorded the same way: whether the operator publishes a verification page for its in-house games and what procedure it describes. It is a published fact about the games the operator makes, not a certification of third-party titles.
What this site does not do
No real-money deposits or withdrawals have been made to test any operator. Pages describe what operators publish, with the date it was read; they publish no placeholder for tests that have not been run.
Scoring weights
Weights fixed on
- Reader availability30%
- Payout-time commitment, as published25%
- Fee transparency and cost20%
- Limit disclosure15%
- Coin and network coverage10%
Evidence states
- published
- not-published
- not-verifiable